On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
So, 1.16wmf4 and 1.16 shared the same branch point, which was perhaps
the start of a tradition. Is this the new rule? I don't have a
strong opinion about whether that should be the case, but it does
change how I think about 1.17 planning.
I would strongly recommend this. Having a running MediaWiki on a top
10 site is a very good form of quality control. And this way we are at
least sure that code is pushed to the WMF serves on a regular
interval. (Although I would prefer a shorter interval, I'm not sure
whether this is feasible at this moment)
Bryan