On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Isarra Yos <zhorishna(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/04/13 20:48, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
On 04/03/2013 03:30 AM, Ori Livneh wrote:
That seems wrong. Of the two,
MediaWiki.org is
clearly the more
successful wiki. It is larger by all measures, and draws a wide pool
of active contributors.
I don't know that it's appropriate to put WMF-only stuff on the
MediaWiki site. Of course, I'm not totally convinced merging the other
way is a good idea other. Although there's overlap between MW proper
and the WMF tech, we have to remember they're distinct.
I know some of WMF-specific stuff would still be useful to others trying
to do similar - things like server setup, installation issues,
configuration and good practices and whatnot comes to mind. Having examples
of what others have done - mostly Wikimedia and ShoutWiki in my case -
proved invaluable when I was setting up my own wikifamily-like thing, at
least, but they weren't exactly easy to find.
Wikimedia's configuration isn't specified on
MediaWiki.org. It's on
wikitech already. The docs you are referring to are non-wikimedia
configuration examples provided by MediaWiki users, and that stuff will
stay there.
- Ryan