Pedro M.V. wrote:
I suggest an "empty redirection".
When you look for a word in the dictionary,the wiktionary ( I suggest change the name to
wikionary, more easy for all languages ) (i.e. domobot ) and appears the message No
matches ( No article title matches and No article text matches), the wiktionary redirects
automatically to the wikipedia article (i.e.
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/domobot ).
This is the "empty redirection".
In any case, the "see more in wikipedia" redirection can be add to, although the
wikionary word it´s not empty ( to get more information from the encyclopedia about the
word searched and found in the dictionary ).
This is, strong and embedded interwiki links.
I suspect that "wikionary" would be more of a problem for people than
"wiktionary" if their language is one that has a "t" in dictionary.
Nevertheless, I can see the problem for a Spanish speaking person who
uses a "diccionario". The Spanish language version will not need to
have exactly the same name as the English Wiktionary. There is already
prcedent for this in Wkikpedia.
The links to Wikipedia for more information are surely a good idea if
Wikipedia already has an article, but empty redirection would create an
entirely different set of new problems. Using your example of "domobot"
it would make access to Wiktionary's "domobot" more difficult for the
person who wants to write a dictionary entry for ways. There are ways
around it, but I wouldn't expect a newcomer to know that.
Eclecticology