Sure. I'll give it a try. It would be a good way to learn more about the code base.
--- On Thu, 7/16/09, Brion Vibber <brion(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
From: Brion Vibber <brion(a)wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] MW QA
To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2009, 9:40 AM
dan nessett wrote:
I understand. This was pointed out in a previous
thread (see "Is this
the right list to ask questions about
parserTests").
Dan, I certainly can say it'd be great to extend the parser
test suite
with a "known to fail" switch we can add to the tests which
are known to
fail. This would be helpful to folks trying to sort out
their changes
from longstanding minor issues without just losing the
information in
those tests [eg, that we know there are cases where we
produce bad tag
nesting, etc].
The test suite can definitely use some love; interested in
poking at it?
-- brion
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l