Domas Mituzas wrote:
even if it could be possible to reduce amount of
pointers in text by
reusing them (one can point same text entry to multiple revisions, as
it was already noted), it could make maintenance/batch operations much
more complicated.
It's already this way, as rollback reuses (reused?) the pointers, so
making other cases also reuse the text entry doesn't add any complexity.
Anyway, there's a bit more visual expression of
our data sizes within
core databases:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pfjIQrTbpVkaIStok1hWAdg
How's that commonswiki is both on s2 and s3? (the one on s2 being 10
times larger)