On 21/08/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/21/06, Rob Church <robchur(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Wikipedians prefer to highlight and tag problems
than to take 30
seconds to fix them, it seems. I can understand that larger cases crop
up, and warrant attention from more than one person, but stupid little
unsourced stubs don't need to be tagged - either find a source on the
web, or find reference that a source might exist within five minutes,
or "prod" it, or whatever we do now.
Are you talking about presumed hoaxes or presumed good articles that
simply don't have any citations?
I'm talking about the little stub that looks 50/50, or the single
spelling error that causes them to roll out the {{cleanup}} tag.
Do we still
have AfD, or was it renamed again?
You mean Arguments for Dimwits?
Those are the best kind!
Rob Church