Let me put this out there so there isn’t confusion. The regular 6 month releases of Ubuntu are the stable releases. A LTS release is released every two years on the same cycle as regular Ubuntu releases. A LTS release is certainly more stable than regular releases, but not calling regular releases stable is a bit misleading.
Techman224
On Feb 20, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Ryan Lane rlane32@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:58 PM, James Forrester jforrester@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 20 February 2014 15:34, Ryan Lane rlane32@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Trevor Parscal <tparscal@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Is that the rule then, we have to make MediaWiki work on anything
Ubuntu
still supports?
Is there a rule?
We should strongly consider ensuring that the latest stable releases of Ubuntu and probably RHEL (or maybe fedora) can run MediaWiki.
Is that a "no, only the latest stable releases", or "yes, the latest stable releases and also the LTS releases"?
If it isn't an LTS it isn't a stable release.
- Ryan
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l