On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Many a time I've talked about this I've hit the argument that gerrit is
confusing to some users and is a barrier for development, but this is a
terrible unacceptable attitude to have in my opinion. Our end users deserve
a certain standard of code. I'm aware using a code review process can slow
things down but I feel this is really essential. I for one greatly benefit
from having every single piece of my code scrutinized and perfected before
being consumed by a wider audience. If this is seen as a barrier, someone
should investigate making it possible to send wiki edits to Gerrit to
simplify that process.
Sending wiki edits to Gerrit for review? Absolutely not.
I'm totally cool with the idea of code review for Gadgets & so forth, just
not
using Gerrit. We considered it for Scribunto (and heck, I wrote half of a
proof
of concept) but shot it down because the idea totally sucked.
-Chad