On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, svetlana <svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au> wrote:
Hi all.
I am reading
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Migration and it
says:
"A review of our project management tools [1] was started, including an
assessment of our needs and requirements, and a discussion of available
options. A request for comment [2] was set up to gauge interest in
simplifying our development toolchain and consolidating our tools (gitblit,
Gerrit, Jenkins, Bugzilla, RT, Trello, and Mingle) into Phabricator. The
result of the RFC was in favor of Phabricator."
The RFC linked is
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator . It is
clearly put wrong. People were not given alternatives. They were told
"let's move to Phabricator" and they said "OK, let's do
that". I am
frustrated. Decide on X, open a "let's do X", get support - this is not
how
decisions are done.
Would anyone oppose me writing another RFC detailing all the available
options (including staying with bugzilla and what cons it has) and posting
an URL to it here?
The RFC was open for quite some time. You missed the comment period, which
is unfortunate, but the decision has already been made and work is already
underway to switch.
- Ryan