Mathias Schindler <neubau@...> quotes Jimbo saying about Klingon:
I guess when it comes right down to it what I mainly
want is that we
have some external objective way to determine the difference between a
language and a vanity project. I don't particularly care what
official list we use.
Is "inclusion in ISO 639" an objective way to determine this? I presume that
ISO
does not allocate language codes to just anyone's conlang project, but Klingon
and Lojban, for example, are there (tlh, jbo).
Cheers,
Philip