Mathias Schindler <neubau@...> quotes Jimbo saying about Klingon:
I guess when it comes right down to it what I mainly want is that we have some external objective way to determine the difference between a language and a vanity project. I don't particularly care what official list we use.
Is "inclusion in ISO 639" an objective way to determine this? I presume that ISO does not allocate language codes to just anyone's conlang project, but Klingon and Lojban, for example, are there (tlh, jbo).
Cheers, Philip