On 8/29/07, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Lyubomirskiy wrote:
you can color it whatever you want. If you enjoy reading ToC with blue
links,
TiggerScript can be trivially configured for that. Then you would get
blue links
normally and green link the current one. And whatever the color, links
are
always styled with underlines.
Michael
Not on (some) wikipedias. They decided the underline was the superflous.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Yes, you are right, Wikipedia does not use link underlining. Well, as I already noted, link coloring is up to the appropriate authorities to decide on. As long as we: 1. highlight the currently read section's link in a distinct color (I like green because it is unobrusive, legible and distinct) 2. provide for quick toggling (without jumping through the usual browser hoops)
I think some readability improvement will be achieved. If under the new setup Wikipedians decide to change ToC links styling, that can happen in due process of time, and if they don't, they don't.
Michael