On 8/29/07, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Michael Lyubomirskiy wrote:
you can color it whatever you want. If you enjoy
reading ToC with blue
links,
TiggerScript can be trivially configured for
that. Then you would get
blue links
normally and green link the current one. And
whatever the color, links
are
always styled with underlines.
Michael
Not on (some) wikipedias. They decided the underline was the superflous.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Yes, you are right, Wikipedia does not use link underlining. Well, as I
already noted, link coloring is up to the appropriate authorities to decide
on. As long as we:
1. highlight the currently read section's link in a distinct color (I like
green because it is unobrusive, legible and distinct)
2. provide for quick toggling (without jumping through the usual browser
hoops)
I think some readability improvement will be achieved. If under the new
setup Wikipedians decide to change ToC links styling, that can happen in due
process of time, and if they don't, they don't.
Michael