On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Platonides
<Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
Also, on places where no memcached or equivalent
is available (i.e.
CACHE_NONE), this will not work.
Then you could be using the objectcache table in the database.
No, that's CACHE_DB. CACHE_NONE really means what it
says.
I could force the usage of the objectcache table even for CACHE_NONE
by creating my own cache object with wfGetCache( CACHE_DB ); Are there
any objections for (ab)using the objectcache table for this purpose?
Bryan