On 8/7/15, Matthew Flaschen mflaschen@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 08/07/2015 11:43 AM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
Thank you for drafting this up, Matt. Who's "we" here?
In that case, "we" meant the Wikimedia technical community (in collaboration with other related groups at WMF). Several people have already participated, but we need more. See e.g. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90908
Thanks,
Matt Flaschen
To be honest, I don't like using "We" in that manner, unless the Wikimedia technical community (For various definitions of that rather ambiguous terms) has discussed the issue and come to agreement.
The "We" is clearly a group of people who met up at Wikimania and thought this would be a good idea. Which is fine, as that's usually how most good ideas start. But there's a large difference between the Wikimedia community proposing something to ? vs a subset of the community proposing the idea to the whole of the community.
-- bawolff