Rowan Collins wrote:
In general, nothing but the very introductory
lead-in of an article
should be headerless, assuming headers are going to be used at all.
In the wiki text, yes. In the HTML output, even the introductory
lead-in has a header -- the article title! ;-) That is also why we
don't want to use =Header= (i.e. <h1>) even though the software allows
it: The article title is already formatted as <h1>, and any section
belonging to the article should be nested inside it.
While I can sympathise with this approach there remains a practical
problem on heavily trafficked maintenance related articles where adding
new sections will automatically add <h2> headings. These need to be
grouped for ease of use, and <h1> is the only thing available for this.
Could a <h1.5> be defined as a compromise.
Ec