Timwi wrote:
Rowan Collins wrote:
In general, nothing but the very introductory lead-in of an article should be headerless, assuming headers are going to be used at all.
In the wiki text, yes. In the HTML output, even the introductory lead-in has a header -- the article title! ;-) That is also why we don't want to use =Header= (i.e. <h1>) even though the software allows it: The article title is already formatted as <h1>, and any section belonging to the article should be nested inside it.
While I can sympathise with this approach there remains a practical problem on heavily trafficked maintenance related articles where adding new sections will automatically add <h2> headings. These need to be grouped for ease of use, and <h1> is the only thing available for this. Could a <h1.5> be defined as a compromise.
Ec