On 9/21/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
But using <ref> for the "body ref" results in an unwanted [1] at the end of the article
Oh yes, this is true currently, but if you scroll back a few messages, Simetrical has noted that a fix for this is already in the works.
Personally, I prefer different tags, since they are doing different jobs (and it's shorter that way).
I generally prefer separate tags for this sort of thing too. I think that a separate <note> tag vs. <ref group=notes> is an example, because I think it adds semantic content for other editors. That said, I'm pretty happy to see these changes going in as-is, and I fully understand the need for backwards compatibility at this point.
Now if only I could up with a better name than "backlink=", but so far I've failed.
Maury