From: "Jens Frank"
Can we, to keep the preferences small, assume that whoever wants to have text formulas is using a text browser and wants text hieroglyphs, too?
Does it mean no user preference and automatically choose text/image render by detecting browser type? It may be sufficient for now. By the way, to reduce preferences page size, it may be a good idea to use menu box (<select>) instead of radio button list. Like this LaTeX option may be only 1 line long. But perhaps, text browser can't use <select> tag? Or what do you think about have a "preference page" and an "advanced preference page"?
GFDL is not compatible with the GPL. To include the code into MediaWiki, the code must be released under a compatible license, like GPL, LGPL, Public Domain, etc.
Ho! I didn't know. So, consider the program is under GPL and pictures under GFDL.
I would volunteer to include hieroglyph support into the new parser, this will not affect performance when there are no hieroglyphs in the code. Can you release a first draft of the code tonight?
Thanks! I will annotate the source and send it to you (or to this list?) shortly. I already send an uncommented version to E23, to have his opinion about code. Cheers,
Guillaume Blanchard (Aoineko)