From: "Jens Frank"
Can we, to keep the preferences small, assume that
whoever wants to have
text formulas is using a text browser and wants text hieroglyphs, too?
Does it mean no user preference and automatically choose text/image render
by detecting browser type? It may be sufficient for now.
By the way, to reduce preferences page size, it may be a good idea to use
menu box (<select>) instead of radio button list. Like this LaTeX option may
be only 1 line long. But perhaps, text browser can't use <select> tag? Or
what do you think about have a "preference page" and an "advanced
preference
page"?
GFDL is not compatible with the GPL. To include the
code into MediaWiki,
the code must be released under a compatible license, like GPL, LGPL,
Public Domain, etc.
Ho! I didn't know. So, consider the program is under GPL and pictures under
GFDL.
I would volunteer to include hieroglyph support into
the new parser, this
will not affect performance when there are no hieroglyphs in the code.
Can you release a first draft of the code tonight?
Thanks! I will annotate the source and send it to you (or to this list?)
shortly.
I already send an uncommented version to E23, to have his opinion about
code.
Cheers,
Guillaume Blanchard (Aoineko)