It does feel messy and fragile to me. Maybe a separate table could store
this?
Like an empty_links table having columns page_id, link_type
(cat,pag,transclude) or such.
Simetrical-3 wrote:
On 9/11/07, brion(a)svn.wikimedia.org <brion(a)svn.wikimedia.org> wrote:
Log Message:
-----------
Revert r25768, r25771
I really don't like inserting bogus entries into the link tables, that
looks fragile and generally horrifying.
domas was the one who suggested it, and Tim didn't object. It seems
reasonable enough to me.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--MediaWiki-CVS--SVN%3A--25778--trunk-phase3-tf4…
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.