It does feel messy and fragile to me. Maybe a separate table could store this?
Like an empty_links table having columns page_id, link_type (cat,pag,transclude) or such.
Simetrical-3 wrote:
On 9/11/07, brion@svn.wikimedia.org brion@svn.wikimedia.org wrote:
Log Message:
Revert r25768, r25771 I really don't like inserting bogus entries into the link tables, that looks fragile and generally horrifying.
domas was the one who suggested it, and Tim didn't object. It seems reasonable enough to me.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l