Krinkle <krinklemail <at> gmail.com> writes:
I'm not sure we should implement collapsible sections for desktop.
If built and instrumented, one may find that users use it a fair bit and
it may be better-than-nothing as
solution for certain use cases. But I don't think collapsible sections
would be an adequate feature for
those use cases.
Our table of contents is in desperate need of improvement. Having that be
more accessible throughout the
reading experience would be a big step forward[1] (much like the Wikipedia
iOS app). Having a proper TOC
means users don't have to collapse/expand anything.
This would allow users to have a birds eye view of the document at all
times, jump to any section at any time,
whilst still being able to scroll through the document top to bottom as
one would expect.
From a performance viewpoint (as opposed to usability) we can still do
optimisations such as not loading
images until a section is accessed (lazy-load).
What is the differences between an extension and a gadget?
Eallan