Magnus Manske wrote:
Neil Harris wrote:
> Am I being naive here, or would a super-dumb implementation with a
> single table with the columns shown below be enough to work in the
> short term?
>
> Page_ID
> Revision_ID
> User_ID
> Rating_ID
> Rating value
> Timestamp
This is what I did; no timestamp, but a varchar for comments.
Topics to
rate and their range (e.g, 1-5) are encoded here as well for user #0.
That's about as dumb as it gets ;-)
I still prefer a 0-10 range of ratings. I think a decimal
normalization would be easier to work with in any subsequent
analysis of results.
One can set the range for each topic individually.
BTW, with values 0-10, you'd have eleven values...