On 11-05-29 03:48 PM, Chad wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ryan Lane rlane32@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure we have standards on hook names (someone please correct me, if this isn't the case).
In core, there certainly is no naming convention for hooks. Some are verb phrases, some are noun phrases. I think if you're adding a hook to an extension you should prefix it with something unlikely to conflict with a core hook (now or in the future).
I believe some extensions do something like "ExtensionName::HookName" but I don't think this is widely enforced.
-Chad
Since this is generic functionality I prefer the generic names anyways myself... Just in case someone goes and creates another tool to merge or delete users, we'd want it to re-use the hook name.