On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ryan Lane
<rlane32(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure we have standards on hook names
(someone please correct
me, if this isn't the case).
In core, there certainly is no naming convention for hooks. Some are verb
phrases, some are noun phrases. I think if you're adding a hook to an
extension you should prefix it with something unlikely to conflict with a
core hook (now or in the future).
I believe some extensions do something like "ExtensionName::HookName"
but I don't think this is widely enforced.
-Chad
Since this is generic functionality I prefer the generic names anyways
myself... Just in case someone goes and creates another tool to merge or
delete users, we'd want it to re-use the hook name.
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [