+1 to this. Lets focus more on the changes and ideas and less on the authors.
IMO, when I keep seeing things like "he did"/"he changed" and
"[so and so]
made it so that" instead of things like "the change made" it throws up red
flags. Just discuss the change, and mention the person minimally (to help
identify the changes or get the attention of person X) or not at all. I've
also seen a lot of things like "misguided" and "bad idea" by some
people.
This raises red flags too. Just discuss *what* the problems are, rather than
saying "this decision sucks".
I've seen this pattern by more than one person.
Tim Starling-2 wrote:
On 08/12/10 03:11, Trevor Parscal wrote:
These blank lines should not - under any
circumstances - be here. But I
do know why they are...
Tim Starling modified the standard distribution of JSMin[1] in some good
and some bad ways. These blank lines are the result of one of these
modifications which I find to be misguided. He's basically only
compressed horizontal white-space, leaving new line characters in place.
The blank lines you see are where the comments used to be.
I have made this point before, clearly upon deaf ears - but I will make
it again.
You could have just said "because Tim thought it would make debugging
easier", and left out all the insults: "misguided", "deaf ears",
etc.
We've each given our opinions on this issue previously, the only thing
you've added here is a dollop of incivility.
Your bullying has not changed my position. I think this is a minor
issue, and I have better things to do than to argue about it. I don't
intend on doing any more work on JSMin for the time being. Feel free
to make the relevant change yourself.
-- Tim Starling
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-Re%3A--Mediawiki-l--vector-components-many-bla…
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.