On 11/07/2013 08:40 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I thought it might be useful to have a hierarchy
of 'architects'. If there are 20 architects, then maybe it doesn't seem
like such a big deal. (And maybe they shouldn't be called 'architects' but
rather 'module owners'.)
Basically, every major piece of WP should have a module owner. For
example, gwicke owns Parsoid. Maybe at some point he gets bored and moves
on to something else, and names someone else the module owner. (That
shouldn't involve any adjustment to WMF salary!)
Is your proposal different from
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers ?
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil