dan nessett wrote:
I understand. This was pointed out in a previous
thread (see "Is this
the right list to ask questions about parserTests").
Dan, I certainly can say it'd be great to extend the parser test suite
with a "known to fail" switch we can add to the tests which are known to
fail. This would be helpful to folks trying to sort out their changes
from longstanding minor issues without just losing the information in
those tests [eg, that we know there are cases where we produce bad tag
nesting, etc].
The test suite can definitely use some love; interested in poking at it?
-- brion