Gerard Meijssen schrieb:
Hoi, There is RDF, there is Semantic MediaWiki. Why should one get a push and the other not. Semantic MediaWiki is used on production websites. Its usability is continuously being improved. No cobwebs there.
SMW is of course an option for integrating metadata, but I expect it will take considerably more time to review that and get it usable on wmf sites.
Having machine readable information is great, but would it not make more sense to have human readable text. As in not only English ?
Sure, but I don't see the connection. The RDF extension just adds the machine readable stuff to the human readable stuff we already have. It's basically for annotating templates, and retrieving that annotation.
-- daniel