Gerard Meijssen schrieb:
There is RDF, there is Semantic MediaWiki. Why should one get a push and the
other not. Semantic MediaWiki is used on production websites. Its usability
is continuously being improved. No cobwebs there.
SMW is of course an option for integrating metadata, but I expect it will take
considerably more time to review that and get it usable on wmf sites.
Having machine readable information is great, but
would it not make more
sense to have human readable text. As in not only English ?
Sure, but I don't see the connection. The RDF extension just adds the machine
readable stuff to the human readable stuff we already have. It's basically for
annotating templates, and retrieving that annotation.