On 10/13/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Heh, "small matter of hardware"? Actually
now that I think about it,
since presumably these blocked users still make up a very small
proportion of total page views (say 1% or less), it could be feasible
to offer an uncached version? But I'm really talking well and truly
out of my arse here.
Remember that merely deciding whether the user/ip is blocked and which
version to offer is going to be require a DB hit of some sort. This
could add up to be quite an overhead?
--
Abi