On 10/13/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
Heh, "small matter of hardware"? Actually now that I think about it, since presumably these blocked users still make up a very small proportion of total page views (say 1% or less), it could be feasible to offer an uncached version? But I'm really talking well and truly out of my arse here.
Remember that merely deciding whether the user/ip is blocked and which version to offer is going to be require a DB hit of some sort. This could add up to be quite an overhead?