Jan.Hidders wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:45:07AM +0200, Marian
Steinbach wrote:
would using MathML (an XML language for
description of mathematic
formulas) be an option?
That has been suggested before and there has been quite some debate over
that. As far as I remember most people were in the end in favour of
TeX/LaTeX because:
- it displays on a wider range of browsers
- its easier to read
- more people know it
-- Jan Hidders
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)ross.bomis.com
http://ross.bomis.com/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
I've just had a look at the TeX to HTML convertor: the results are
horrible on my browser: mathML or rendered images from source is the way
to go, I think.
I suggest something like this:
0 Use TeX in the Wiki source (perhaps in <tex> </tex> delimiters?)
1 Convert TeX to MathML.
2 Serve MathML to modern browsers
3 Serve rendered images of MathML (eg, using the Gecko engine) to users
with old browsers.
Why not render TeX directly? Because the MathML "bottleneck" will ensure
that everyone sees the same thing,
and it also provides a way to move eventually to supporting native
MathML in the source, when MathML is a mature, editable, format in most
browsers. Even better would be if we could do a 2-way TeX <-> MathML
conversion, but that's probably asking too much.
Neil