"Brion VIBBER" skribis:
Paul Ebermann wrote:
> "Brion VIBBER" skribis:
>>Note that _theoretically_ a legal UTF-8 sequence could also be legal ISO
>>8859-1.
>
> [eo] Cxu vere?
[...]
Jes ja, sed ne cxiuj UTF-8-kodoj trovigxas en la gamo rezervita; [...]
Mi komprenis ke vi diris "Cxiu legala UTF-8-sekvenco estas
legala ISO-8859-1". Nun mi komprenas ke vi diris
"Ekzistas UTF-8-sekvencoj kiuj estas legala ISO-8859-1".
Pardonu la konfuzo.
> [en] Really?
[...]
Sure, but not all UTF-8 codes will find themselves in the reserved
range; [...]
I understood that you said "Each legal UTF-8-sequence is
legal ISO-8859-1", now I understand that you said "there
are legal UTF-8-sequences which are legal ISO-8859-1".
Sorry for the confusion.
Pauxlo