Le 23/08/2015 01:09, Brian Wolff a écrit :
On 8/22/15, Tyler Romeo tylerromeo@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Brian Wolff bawolff@gmail.com wrote:
For example, MediaWiki is intentionally GPLv2, not GPLv3.
MediaWiki is not intentionally GPLv2. It merely is v2 now and the community cannot come to a consensus on whether to change it, thus it remains in its current stagnant state.
I would consider that intentional. The status quo is intentionally staying as it is, because there isn't agreement to change it. (I'll be honest though, I don't really remember what the result was last time the whole GPL version thing was discussed)
Unintentional I would define as - everyone thinks its a good idea to switch, but nobody could be bothered to update the wiki page.
To be fair, the license is GPLv2 or later.
I am myself opposed to switch to GPLv3. Given the amount of code I own in MediaWiki core, I think I am in a position to veto such a switch.
But I am not a lawyer.