On 9/21/07, Maury Markowitz <maury.markowitz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/20/07, Simetrical
<Simetrical+wikilist(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<references group="foo" />
<references group="bar" />
Out of curiosity, how is {{reflist}} templated in? If I were to do
{{reflist|group="foo"}}, would that work?
Someone would need to update {{reflist}}.
I tend to use reflist these
days because it also applies nice styling.
The nice styling should be applied via CSS to all <references>, not
just {{reflist}} ones. But that's not a software issue.
On 9/21/07, Maury Markowitz <maury.markowitz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/21/07, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But using <ref> for the "body
ref" results in an unwanted [1] at the
end of the article
Oh yes, this is true currently, but if you scroll back a few messages,
Simetrical has noted that a fix for this is already in the works.
I said it wouldn't be hard to fix. That's different from saying that
someone plans to fix it in the near future.
On 9/21/07, Michael Daly <michaeldaly(a)kayakwiki.org> wrote:
How about:
<ref name="name">The Best Book Ever Written</xref>
<ref name="name" append="pp 1-7" />
<ref name="name" append="pp 8-14" />
Backward compatible, consistent with tag formats and no new tags.
This is what I favor.
On 9/21/07, Maury Markowitz <maury.markowitz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<ref section="page 22-23"
backlink="3a" />
seems pretty damb handy.
Why?
On 9/21/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
One thing I haven't seen discussed - how will we
distinguish between
different groups with the inline links? If I see <sup>1</sup> in an
article, how am I to know if it's a note or a ref?
Being able to change the superscript progression for a given group
would be a separate request. Implementing groups alone would only
really be useful for per-section refs or similar, not for separate
refs/notes (since the numbers would conflict).