On 9/21/07, Maury Markowitz maury.markowitz@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/20/07, Simetrical Simetrical+wikilist@gmail.com wrote:
<references group="foo" /> <references group="bar" />
Out of curiosity, how is {{reflist}} templated in? If I were to do {{reflist|group="foo"}}, would that work?
Someone would need to update {{reflist}}.
I tend to use reflist these days because it also applies nice styling.
The nice styling should be applied via CSS to all <references>, not just {{reflist}} ones. But that's not a software issue.
On 9/21/07, Maury Markowitz maury.markowitz@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/21/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
But using <ref> for the "body ref" results in an unwanted [1] at the end of the article
Oh yes, this is true currently, but if you scroll back a few messages, Simetrical has noted that a fix for this is already in the works.
I said it wouldn't be hard to fix. That's different from saying that someone plans to fix it in the near future.
On 9/21/07, Michael Daly michaeldaly@kayakwiki.org wrote:
How about:
<ref name="name">The Best Book Ever Written</xref>
<ref name="name" append="pp 1-7" /> <ref name="name" append="pp 8-14" />
Backward compatible, consistent with tag formats and no new tags.
This is what I favor.
On 9/21/07, Maury Markowitz maury.markowitz@gmail.com wrote:
<ref section="page 22-23" backlink="3a" />
seems pretty damb handy.
Why?
On 9/21/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I haven't seen discussed - how will we distinguish between different groups with the inline links? If I see <sup>1</sup> in an article, how am I to know if it's a note or a ref?
Being able to change the superscript progression for a given group would be a separate request. Implementing groups alone would only really be useful for per-section refs or similar, not for separate refs/notes (since the numbers would conflict).