We wish to restrict anonymous views to our mediawiki installation. Every
unauthorized user is to be redirected to a particular page. This page
may not be a wiki page.
We wish to restrict anonymous views to our mediawiki installation. Every
unauthorized user is to be redirected to a particular page. This page
may not be a wiki page.
Can we do this using LocalSettings.php?
If not, do we have any extension/hook for the very purpose?
Thanks in advance
>> That should be re-licensed or deleted, really.
>>
>> -Aaron Schulz
I emailed gri6507 accordingly. And in my view, that should be "re-licensed,
rewritten or deleted".
Hojjat (aka Huji)
Hi Angela,
2008/1/2, Angela Beesley <angela(a)wikia.com> wrote:
> I'm happy to host this for you at Wikia.
Thanks for the offer but I think I'd like to wait until I find
alternative ad-free hosting. This is because having ads can lead to a
slight loss of editorial freedom. Or would you cut me a special deal:
no ads at first? Then you get the benefit of this nice, useful
resource (Extrapedia) having "wikia.com" in its domain name and all
the Wikia branding on the sides of the screen and on the start page.
What do you think?
> You might also like to check
> out annex.wikia.com which is a project aimed at rescuing deleted
> articles from Wikipedia.
Hmm. Interesting wiki but different in that want to be just a
temporary holding area for articles until they are moved to other
Wikias.
Now I wonder in general: why do there need to be multiple Wikias? Why
can't all articles from all Wikias be one wiki?
Cheers,
-Jason
P.S. If someone here knows how to set Reply-To headers, could they
crosspost this to WikiEN-L and set Reply-To so that all future replies
will go there, not here?
--
Jason Spiro: corporate trainer, web developer, IT consultant.
I support Linux, UNIX, Windows, and more.
Contact me to discuss your needs and get a free estimate.
+1 (613) 668-6096 / Email: info(a)jspiro.com / MSN: jasonspiro(a)hotmail.com
gri6507(a)svn.wikimedia.org wrote:
> Revision: 29380
> Author: gri6507
> Date: 2008-01-07 13:44:01 +0000 (Mon, 07 Jan 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Initial checkin of extension into Subversion.
[snip]
This JS code's license appears problematic:
> +// ===================================================================
> +// Author: Matt Kruse <matt(a)mattkruse.com>
> +// WWW: http://www.mattkruse.com/
> +//
> +// NOTICE: You may use this code for any purpose, commercial or
> +// private, without any further permission from the author. You may
> +// remove this notice from your final code if you wish, however it is
> +// appreciated by the author if at least my web site address is kept.
> +//
> +// You may *NOT* re-distribute this code in any way except through its
> +// use. That means, you can include it in your product, or your web
> +// site, or any other form where the code is actually being used. You
> +// may not put the plain javascript up on your site for download or
> +// include it in your javascript libraries for download.
> +// If you wish to share this code with others, please just point them
> +// to the URL instead.
> +// Please DO NOT link directly to my .js files from your site. Copy
> +// the files to your server and use them there. Thank you.
> +// ===================================================================
-- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
Hi, I've traditionally used analog (http://www.analog.cx/) for my log
file analysis, but I've recently started using MediaWiki as my CMS for
my sites, and now I'm not sure what the best way to analyze the logs is.
I use all the pretty url rewriting stuff, so my pages look like this:
http://blah.com/This_Is_a_Page
so I can't use .html, or .php, or all the analog defaults to determine
what a "page" is. I'm currently just setting analog to count everything
as a page view, but that obviously grossly overestimates the actual page
views due to all the css, js, images, and whatnot.
Does anybody have an analog config file they use with MediaWiki that
works well? Is there something better than analog to use with
MediaWiki? I'm talking just about server log analysis, not client side
analytics stuff like urchin/google/etc., that's a different issue.
Thanks for any advice you have,
Chris
I have just started using Firefox at home, and the Wikipedia pages have an odd
appearance, as if the frames or CSS were not correct.
Neither of the browsers that I have used in the past, Mozilla and Internet
Explorer, are showing this odd appearance, nor does Firefox at my office. I am
running Firefox under Windows XP, Service Pack 2. Any ideas about the peculiar
appearance, as described following this paragraph? I am not having trouble with
other complex pages in Firefox at my home, for instance NOAA (weather) pages
such as
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/forecast/MapClick.php?site=pqr&smap=1&textField1=44…
.
Detailed description:
en.Wikipedia.org main page today starts out with a screen-width "frame" (or
whatever it is; I'll continue to use this term, without the quote marks)
stating: "Thanks to everyone who donated in the Wikimedia Foundation
fundraiser!" and so on.
Under that is a screen-width Welcome to Wikipedia frame, with the welcome on the
left and the portals on the right. Under that are two (approximately)
half-width frames, with Today's Article followed by Did You Know on the left,
and In The News and On This Day on the right.
Under that is a screen-width frame for Today's Featured Picture (image on the
left, text on the right). Under that are unframed full-width "paragraphs" for
Other areas of Wikipedia, Wikipedia's sister projects and Wikipedia languages.
Under that, in succession, are Views, Personal tools, Navigation, interaction,
Search, Toolbox, Languages, and legal information (disclaimers, GNU and the
like) -- those items that are supposed to be to the left of the article.
Why are they at the bottom? Is there a Firefox setting that I have wrong? Any
other ideas? Thanks for your assistance!
Hi,
I'm an admin for the Romanian Wikipedia. How/where can we make a request
in order to get our VfD pages added to robots.txt?
(http://en.wikipedia.org/robots.txt seems the same with
http://ro.wikipedia.org/robots.txt, so I assume it's the same file; if
this can be customized locally, that would be the best solution, but it
doesn't look that way)
Thank you,
Gutza
brion(a)svn.wikimedia.org schreef:
> Revision: 29244
> Author: brion
> Date: 2008-01-03 23:39:21 +0000 (Thu, 03 Jan 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Remove ApiChangeRights. Duplicates code, doesn't handle current permissions model properly.
Gimme a chance to catch up man ;) This new permissions model has been
introduced about a week ago. I agree on the code duplication thing,
SpecialUserrights.php needs some more generalization there.
I'll work on improving ApiChangeRights. I just don't think it was
necessary to remove the entire module, as no security leaks are
introduced (the old model ApiChangeRights uses is more restrictive than
the new one). You could also have tried to fix it yourself (although you
may not have time for that, I know you're a busy guy), or just drop me a
note.
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)