I think the below is also interesting to the Wikisource community.

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org Date: 2015-12-04 16:43 GMT+01:00 Subject: [Wikidata] Fwd: "Wikipedia as the front matter to all research": A brown bag on scholarly citations in Wikipedia this Friday 12/4 @ 12 PT To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." < wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>

A reminder that this will be streamed today at 9pm CET / 12pm PST We’ll be talking https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_as_the_front_matter_to_all_research about unique identifiers and bibliographic/citation data in general as well as https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Source_MetaData

You can join the conversation via IRC on #wikimedia-office

Dario

Begin forwarded message:

*From: *Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org *Date: *December 2, 2015 at 11:01:51 AM PST *To: *wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, Research into Wikimedia content and communities wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject: **"Wikipedia as the front matter to all research": A brown bag on scholarly citations in Wikipedia this Friday 12/4 @ 12 PT *

Come and join us for a brown bag this *Friday* *December 4 *at 12 PT to learn about *unique identifiers and* *scholarly citations in Wikipedia*, why they matter and how we can bridge the gap between the Wikimedia, research and librarian communities.

*Wikipedia as the front matter to all research*

YouTube stream: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB_oexqz8pA Event information on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_as_the_front_matter_to_all_researc...

*Measuring citizen engagement with the scholarly literature through Wikipedia citations.* Geoffrey Bilder, CrossRef

Wikipedia (in toto) is probably the 5th largest referrer of citations to the scholarly literature. That is, more Wikipedia users click on and follow citations to the scholarly literature *from* Wikipedia domains than from any single scholarly publisher in the world. What does this tell us about general interest in the scholarly literature? What does this tell us about scholarly engagement with editing Wikipedia articles? The short answer is “we don’t know.” But we are actively working with Wikimedia to find out.

*Building the sum of all human citations* Dario Taraborelli, WIkimedia Foundation

As sourcing and verifiability of online information are threatened http://www.slideshare.net/dartar/citing-as-a-public-service-building-the-sum-of-all-human-citations by the explosion of answer engines and the changing habits of web users, Wikimedia has an outstanding opportunity to extract and store source data for every conceivable statement and make it transparently verifiable by its users. In this talk, I’ll present a grassroots effort https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Source_MetaData to create a human-curated, comprehensive repository of all human citations in Wikidata.

––––––––––––– Bonus read: a real-time tracker of scholarly citations added to Wikipedia, built with Raspberry Pi http://blog.crossref.org/2015/12/crossref-labs-plays-with-the-raspberry-pi-z...

*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter

*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter

_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata