Alex Brollo a écrit :

I'm happy to let you know that it.source community started a project to build one, or more, transcriptions "with scans" of Alighieri's Divina Commedia; presently it.source has only a "naked" version.

An authoritative comments is that by Lana: http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Indice:Commedia_-_Inferno_(Lana).djvu http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Pagina:Commedia_-_Inferno_%28Lana%29.djvu/117.

But, please, take a look to its page structure: http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Pagina:Commedia_-_Inferno_(Lana).djvu/117 http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Pagina:Commedia_-_Inferno_%28Lana%29.djvu/117

As you see, pages mix two different, indipendent texts, Alighieri's text ad Lana's comment, each one with its own, separate annotations. The author's aim was, obvioulsy, to allow an immediate comparison of the comment and original text. How can be solved the trouble of indipendent annotations, of reasonably simple use of pages tag, and of other issues, saving the author's aim too? Are there running examples of proofread works with a similar page structure, just to learn needed tricks from them ?

Alex

If you use <pages/> you will not be able to transclude the first text only, or the second text only. This could be an interesting feature to add, but it is not there yet. For the moment it needs to be done manually.

besides that, you can do various things with {{Option}}

For the different types of footnotes see http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Ronsard_-_Choix_de_po%C3%A9sies,_%C3%A9di...

Thomas