I go sometimes into fr.source as a contributor, even if my French is very poor; I appreciate a lot fr.source editing tools for proofreading, they document a deep interest about any trick to make editing faster, safer, and more comfortable. This "evidence of care" is very rewarding for any contributor.
Alex
2016-11-03 12:46 GMT+01:00 Ankry ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl:
2016-11-03 10:12 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni zanni.andrea84@gmail.com:
Thanks Mathieu. What really strikes me is that challenge is doable in fr.wikisource: in many others would be complete madness ;-) Also, Polish Wikisource is doing great.
What interest me is understanding how they are building their community of active and super-active proofreaders: are they doing something that other wikisource aren't?
Not sure if there is a link but when you mention fr.ws and pl.ws I can immediately think of a correlation since these two are among the rare wikisources which are prooferead system only (or nearly only : 92 % and
96
% of mainspace pages back with scan, see http://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php).
Cdlt, ~nicolas
In pl.ws we have a policy that if a text *can* be processed using ProofreadPage (legal aspects, scan availability) then it *has to* be processed using this extention.
Ankry
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l