Hi Bodhisattwa Mandal,
Thanks for replying back.
Actually since the screen size of the reader is not know it would be best if there is some kind of auto width solution. For example a horizontal straight line created with template:rule. The width of the line is auto. If I use many w|40 parameter there might be chances of overflow or underflow.
Thanks & Regards, J. Balaji.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Bodhisattwa Mandal < bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com> wrote:
For custom rule, you can use as many w|40 parameter as you like to get full length wave.
Best,
On 5 Jan 2018 10:30 pm, "balaji" balajijagadesh@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the help.
Cheers
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Alex Brollo alex.brollo@gmail.com wrote:
Let's try too with backgrounds, I'll test using my tamil wikisource user.common.css, then you will export into MediaWiki:Common.css if I'll get a decent result.
Alex
2018-01-05 17:42 GMT+01:00 balaji balajijagadesh@gmail.com:
Hello every one, Thanks for everyone taking effort to reply. I tried various solutions.
Repeating a single character wouldnt be desirable. Because the effect wouldnt be same for different screen sizes.
I tried the custom rule template. But with the parameters i could do, I could only produce a wavy line of short length. Is there a way to create the wave effect for full length like a line?
I tried a solution by Alex. It seems to work okay in firefox. But doesnt look good in chrome.
As people pointed out, the shape of the line doesnt convey any meaning. Its true. Just wanted to try if there is any easy way to format to look as its original. If not possible going to use a simple straight line.
Thanks
J. Balaji
(User:Balajijagadesh https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Balajijagadesh)
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 4 January 2018 at 23:09, Alex Brollo alex.brollo@gmail.com wrote:
2018-01-04 23:16 GMT+01:00 Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
Why not just use a straight horizontal rue? It's styling, not
content,
and conveys no significant meaning.
I respectfully disagree - works are content, editions are contens plus styling IMHO.
In that case, what does the wavy line /mean/? How would you convey that meaning to a non-visual user?
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l