Michael Jörgens wrote: ...
And I don't think that ThomasV is willing to accept any consensus which is not according to his way of thinking Have a look at the other ws. Has there been any question of ThomasV what the consensus in this ws is - or is there only his dictate!
Have a look here.
While I agree that working with ThomasV is sometimes difficult, he is right here: allowing IPs to mark pages as proofread defeat the purpose of the tool. This notation is intended as a certificate by an account that proofreading is done. Because IP are not constant, the same person could proofread, and then validate the page. At the very least, IPs should not be allowed to validate pages. I don't know if this distinction is possible. And if people are able to proofread articles, they are certainly also able to login.
Sincerly
Regards,
Yann