The list deserves an active and responsive admin. So whether or not the existing admin is still interested/involved, it makes sense to appoint another admin (or two) from among the folks who've been more active lately. (and yes, a Bugzilla ticket would be the way to do it.)
A.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Andrea Zanni zanni.andrea84@gmail.comwrote:
Now I see that i replied 3 weeks ago on his User talk... '-___- I'll let you know.
Aubrey
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:11 PM, billinghurst billinghurst@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:28:10 +0100, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all. I would like to raise the issue that this mailing list *seems* not to
have
active administrators/moderators.
As per suggestion of Asaf, I asked zhaladsar (who seems to be the only admiin) several times (in these months) to be co-administrator. He never replied. Also, some users seem to have problems too (es https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aubrey#Wikisource_User_Group)
How can we solve this? I'd like to be an admin of the list, I don't know
- if you are OK with it
- how to do this (maybe a bug in bugzilla?)
Aubrey
I am pretty certain that I have seen Zhaladshar around the traps, though wouldn't swear to it. Have you tried a message on his enWS user page? if all else fails, then I would think that a bugzilla request though depending on what the bug is to be. If it was to get a new admin, then I would think that there should be a specific discussion, probably two, list and mulWS proposing a spill if the admin is otherwise lost.
Regards, Billinghurst
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l