Glad to see this discussion. Pinging Alex Stinson for this discussion in case he has any insights to add from a GLAM perspective.
Pine
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:48 AM, David Cuenca Tudela dacuetu@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
what might be the significant role our unique advantage might play in 15 years?
There are some circumstantial aspects that might be relevant for Wikisource:
- With the emergence of machine learning, do volunteers really need to
spend so much time formatting? Or will we able to use our data to train a system to do some pre-formatting for us?
- With the existing flood of data, can we consider ws as a relevancy
setter? If a document has been transcribed/imported into wikisource, is that enough to make the document relevant?
- Considering that not all libraries might have the resources to develop
their own platform, can Wikisource be used as a neutral platform by external agents as a complement to their own infrastructure?
Regarding the 15 years time frame, it might be a good exercise to examine different scenarios. Yes, one could be to think big, to expect growth and a favorable environment. But what about the opposite? What if there are *less* people able to contribute?
Cheers, Micru
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l