Wikisource-l August 2010

wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org

12 participants
12 discussions

Re: [Wikisource-l] Office hours with Sue Gardner
by Philippe Beaudette 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Just a reminder.... this is in about 11 hours :) Philippe On Aug 30, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette wrote: > Hi all, > > Sue Gardner, the Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, > will be having office hours this Tuesday (Aug 31) at 23:00 UTC > (16:00 PT, 19:00 ET) on IRC in #wikimedia-office. > > If you do not have an IRC client, there are two ways you can come chat > using a web browser: First is using the Wikizine chat gateway at > <http://chatwikizine.memebot.com/cgi-bin/cgiirc/irc.cgi>. Type a > nickname, select irc.freenode.net from the top menu and > #wikimedia-office from the following menu, then login to join. > > Also, you can access Freenode by going to http:// > webchat.freenode.net/, > typing in the nickname of your choice and choosing wikimedia-office as > the channel. You may be prompted to click through a security > warning, > which you can click to accept. > > Please feel free to forward (and translate!) this email to any other > relevant email lists you happen to be on. > > ____________________ > Philippe Beaudette > Head of Reader Relations > Wikimedia Foundation > > philippe(a)wikimedia.org > > Imagine a world in which every human being can freely share in > the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! > > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate >>

1 1

Office hours with Sue Gardner
by Philippe Beaudette 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hi all, Sue Gardner, the Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, will be having office hours this Thursday at 17:00 UTC (10:00 PT, 13:00 ET) on IRC in #wikimedia-office. If you do not have an IRC client, there are two ways you can come chat using a web browser: First is using the Wikizine chat gateway at <http://chatwikizine.memebot.com/cgi-bin/cgiirc/irc.cgi>. Type a nickname, select irc.freenode.net from the top menu and #wikimedia-office from the following menu, then login to join. Also, you can access Freenode by going to http://webchat.freenode.net/, typing in the nickname of your choice and choosing wikimedia-office as the channel. You may be prompted to click through a security warning, which you can click to accept. Please feel free to forward (and translate!) this email to any other relevant email lists you happen to be on. ____________________ Philippe Beaudette Head of Reader Relations Wikimedia Foundation philippe(a)wikimedia.org Imagine a world in which every human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

1 1

Re: [Wikisource-l] Parallel text alignment (was: Push translation)
by Lars Aronsson 18 Aug '10

18 Aug '10

On 08/07/2010 02:23 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote: > Word-processing the Google output to arrive at a readable, written text creates more work than it saves. This is where our experience differs. I'm working faster with the Google Translator Toolkit than without. > If Google want to build up their translation memory, I suggest they pay publishers for permission to analyse existing, published translations, and read those into their memory. This will give them a database of translations that the market judged good enough to publish, written by people who (presumably) understood the subject matter they were working in. If we forget Google for a while, this is actually something that we could do on our own. There are enough texts in Wikisource (out of copyright books) that are available in more than one language. In some cases, we will run into old spelling and use of language, but it will be better than nothing. The result could be good input to Wiktionary. Here is the Norwegian original of Nansen's Eskimoliv, http://no.wikisource.org/wiki/Indeks:Nansen-Eskimoliv.djvu And here is the Swedish translation, both from 1891, http://sv.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:Eskimålif.djvu Norwegian: Grønland er paa en eiendommelig vis knyttet til vort land og folk. Swedish: Grönland är på ett egendomligt sätt knutet till vårt land och vårt folk. As you can see, there is one difference already in this first sentence: The original ends "to our country and people", while the translation ends "to our country and our people". Is there any good free software for aligning parallel texts and extracting translations? Looking around, I found NAtools, TagAligner, and Bitextor, but they require texts to be marked up already. Are these the best and most modern tools available? -- Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se

4 5

Back to the Scroll
by Magnus Manske 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

Hi all, after some discussion on wikitech-l, I made a Google Books-like display demo for wikisource content. It should work on any multipage djvu or PDF. To link to it, you'll need: * The file name for the original (needs to be on commons) * The total number of pages (couldn't find a way to get that automatically anywhere...) * The page to start on Thus armed, you can construct a URL like this: http://toolserver.org/~magnus/book2scroll/index.html?file=Transactions_of_t… The default parameter-less URL will fall back on the DNB vol. 11: http://toolserver.org/~magnus/book2scroll/index.html Note that this is HTML/CSS/JS only; no toolserver backend script/database is involved. Awaiting onslaught of critique, Magnus

7 22

page numbers and the <pages/> command
by ThomasV 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

Dear all, I recently added a new item to the list of shared scripts : "PageNumbers.js" is a script that renders page numbers associated with the "page" command. Javascript rendering allows phrases that cross page breaks to be indexed by search engines, and also to be searched in the navigator window. (see http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium#searching_across_page_… ) In addition, the script highlights the text that corresponds to a page when the mouse is passed over a page link. Example : http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Transactions_of_the_Geological_Society,_1st_s… To install it on your wiki, see http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Shared_scripts Thomas

3 4

Re: [Wikisource-l] Wikisource books and web 1.0 pages
by Lars Aronsson 13 Aug '10

13 Aug '10

On 08/13/2010 07:36 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > I have doubts about whether this is the right approach for books. > Offering the book as plain HTML pages, one for each chapter and also > one for the whole book (for printing and searching), seems more > useful. Browsers can cope with such long pages just fine, One web page per chapter, yes, but not for whole books, especially not for the thicker and larger books. Web pages beyond 100 kbytes still load slowly, especially when you're on a wireless network in a crowded conference room. The problem is, after you scan a book you only know where the physical pages begin and end. The chapter boundaries can only be detected by manual proofreading and markup. The sequence from beginning to end of the book is the same for both pages and chapters (except for complicated cases with footnotes, as discussed recently). A smooth web 2.0, map-style scrolling through that sequence can be a way to overcome the delay between fast mechanical scanning and slow manual proofreading. -- Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se

1 0

Re: [Wikisource-l] [Wikitech-l] Wikisource books and web 1.0 pages (was: pas de sujet)
by Lars Aronsson 13 Aug '10

13 Aug '10

On 08/11/2010 09:46 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > This seems like a very weird way to do things. Why is the book being > split up by page to begin with? For optimal reading, you should put a > lot more than one book-page's worth of content on each web page. ThomasV will give the introduction to ProofreadPage and its purpose. I will take a step back. A book is typically 40-400 pages, because that is how much you can comfortably bind in one volume (one spine) and sell as a commercial product. A web 1.0 (plain HTML + HTTP) page is typically a smaller chunk of information, say 1-100 kbytes. To match (either in Wikisource or Wikibooks) the idea of a book with web technology, the book needs to split up, either according to physical book pages (Wikisource with the ProofreadPage extension) or chapters (Wikisource without ProofreadPage or Wikibooks). In either case, the indiviual pages have a sequential relationship. If you print the pages, you can glue them together and the sequence makes sense, which is not the case with Wikipedia. Such pages have links to the previous and next page in sequence (which Wikipedia articles don't have). Wikipedia, Wikibooks and Wikisource mostly use web 1.0 technology. A very different approach to web browsing was taken when Google Maps was launched in 2005, the poster project for the "web 2.0". You arrive at the map site with a coordinate. From there, you can pan in any direction and new parts of the map (called "tiles") are downloaded by advanced JavaScript and XML (AJAX) calls as you go. Your browser will never hold the entire map. It doesn't matter how big the entire map is, just like it doesn't matter how big the entire Wikipedia website is. The unit of information to fetch is the "tile", just like the web 1.0 unit was the HTML page. If we applied this web 2.0 principle to Wikibooks and Wikisource, we wouldn't need to have pages with previous/next links. We could just have smooth, continuous scrolling in one long sequence. Readers could still arrive at a given coordinate (chapter or page), but continue from there in any direction. Examples of such user interfaces for books are Google Books and the Internet Archive online reader. You can link to page 14 like this: http://books.google.com/books?id=Z_ZLAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA14 and then scroll up (to page 13) or down (to page 15). The whole book is never in your browser. New pages are AJAX loaded as they are needed. It's like Google maps except that you can only pan in two directions (one dimensions), not in the four cardinal directions. And the zoom is more primitive here. After you have scrolled to page 19, you need to use the "Link" tool to know the new URL to link to. At the Internet Archive, the user interface is similar, but the URL in your browser is updated as you scroll (for better or worse), http://www.archive.org/stream/devisesetembleme00lafeu#page/58/mode/1up If we only have scanned images of book pages, this is simple enough, because each scanned image is like a "tile" in Google maps. But in Wikisource, we have also run OCR software to extract a text layer for each page, and we have proofread that text to make it searchable. I still have not learned JavaScript, but I guess you could make AJAX calls for a chunk of text and add that to the scrollable web page, just like you can add tiled images. Google has not done this, however. If you switch to "plain text" viewing mode, http://books.google.com/books?pg=PA14&id=Z_ZLAAAAMAAJ&output=text you get traditional web 1.0 "pages" with links to the previous and next web page. (Each of Google's text pages contains text from 5 book pages, e.g. page 11-15, only to make things more confusing.) But the real challenge comes when you want to wiki edit one such chunk of scrollable text. I think it could work similar to our section editing of a long Wikipedia article. But to be really elegant, I should be able, when editing a section, to scroll up or down beyond the current section, in an eternal textarea. If we can solve this, "section editing 2.0" that goes outside of the box (or maybe we should skip directly to WYSIWYG editing), then we can have the beginning of a whole new Wikisource interface. -- Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se

1 0

proposal to extend the ref tag syntax
by ThomasV 12 Aug '10

12 Aug '10

Sorry, I forgot a topic ; reposting the previous message: I would like to extend the syntax of the <ref> tag (Cite extension), in order to deal with footnotes that are spread on several transcluded pages. Since the Cite extension is widely used, I guess I better ask here first. Here is an illustration of the problem : http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Robert_the_Bruce_and_the_struggle_for_Sc… On the bottom of the scan you can see the second half of a footnote. That footnote begins at the previous page : http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Robert_the_Bruce_and_the_struggle_for_Sc… Wikisourcers currently have no way to deal with these cases in a clean way. I have written a patch for this (the code is here : http://dpaste.org/QOMH/ ). This patch extends the "ref" syntax by adding a "follow" parameter, like this : <ref follow="foo">bar</ref> After two pages are transcluded, the wikitext passed to the parser will look like this : blah blah blah blah blah blah<ref name="note1">beginning of note 1</ref> blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah<ref follow="note1">end of note</ref> blah blah blah This wikitext is rendered as a single footnote, located in the text at the position of the parent <ref>. If the parent <ref> is not found (as is the case when you render only the second page), then the text inside the tag is rendered at the beginning of the list of references, with no number and no link. does this make sense ? Thomas

2 2

Re: [Wikisource-l] [Wikisource] proposal to extend the ref tag syntax
by Aleator Wiki 12 Aug '10

12 Aug '10

And what about the LST template combined to section tags? One example: - Page 1 is http://ca.wikisource.org/wiki/P%C3%A0gina:Cansons_de_la_terra_%281866%29.dj… and contains some text with one full reference, also the beginnig of a second ref, and we can also see the transclusion of the following portion of the second ref (from Page 2, thanks to "Lst" template). We see the full second ref, but just proofread it at its "physical" page. - Page 2 is http://ca.wikisource.org/wiki/P%C3%A0gina:Cansons_de_la_terra_%281866%29.dj… and contains 2 sections: some text with one reference, and the following portion of the reference (transcluded at Page 1). So, the final transclusion uses the "Page" template with the "section" parameter when necessary: http://ca.wikisource.org/wiki/Cansons_de_la_terra_-_Volum_I/Introducci%C3%B2 It's a bit uncomfortable, but also in books made of paper!! Why do they break refs?? Regards, Aleator ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:43:35 +0200 From: ThomasV <thomasV1(a)gmx.de> Subject: [Wikisource-l] (pas de sujet) To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>, "discussion list for Wikisource, the free library" <wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> Message-ID: <4C62C527.2000204(a)gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would like to extend the syntax of the <ref> tag (Cite extension), in order to deal with footnotes that are spread on several transcluded pages. Since the Cite extension is widely used, I guess I better ask here first. Here is an illustration of the problem : http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Robert_the_Bruce_and_the_struggle_for_Sc… On the bottom of the scan you can see the second half of a footnote. That footnote begins at the previous page : http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Robert_the_Bruce_and_the_struggle_for_Sc… Wikisourcers currently have no way to deal with these cases in a clean way. I have written a patch for this (the code is here : http://dpaste.org/QOMH/ ). This patch extends the "ref" syntax by adding a "follow" parameter, like this : <ref follow="foo">bar</ref> After two pages are transcluded, the wikitext passed to the parser will look like this : blah blah blah blah blah blah<ref name="note1">beginning of note 1</ref> blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah<ref follow="note1">end of note</ref> blah blah blah This wikitext is rendered as a single footnote, located in the text at the position of the parent <ref>. If the parent <ref> is not found (as is the case when you render only the second page), then the text inside the tag is rendered at the beginning of the list of references, with no number and no link. does this make sense ? Thomas

1 0

Re: [Wikisource-l] <ref> tag and multiple transcluded pages
by Mark Clements (HappyDog) 12 Aug '10

12 Aug '10

"Neil Kandalgaonkar" <neilk(a)wikimedia.org> wrote in message news:4C62E7E2.3040904@wikimedia.org... > For obvious reasons only consecutive pages should be allowed here. > Not true. Sometimes a footnote will start on one page, and the next page will have a full-page illustration, and then the footnote will continue on the subsequent pages. In books where there all the photgraphic plates are next to each other (which is very common, due to the printing/binding process) the gap could be of an arbitrary length. - Mark Clements (HappyDog)

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

Wikisource-l August 2010