Sir As a Professor of English and having specialization in Stylistics, I teach literature, linguistics, phonetics, stylistics and creative writing to PG students. I have published two poetry books in English and a Monograph on Literary stylistics. Scholars have obtained Ph.D. on my creative and innovative poetry. My poems have appeared in international journals in India and abroad. I want to submit my biography to be included in Wikipedia, and I want to submit my Vital Article on Linguistic Landscaping in Poetry and other feature articles. Will you please guide me how to carry out my task, that is, the process and link for my task . May I expect your early reply. With deep regards. Prof. (Dr.) Nar Deo Sharma H.No. 2/415, Kala Kuan, ALWAR-301001(Rajasthan) INDIA
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:30 PM, wikidata-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikidata mailing list submissions to wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wikidata-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at wikidata-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wikidata digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Comparisons between DBpedia and Wikidata (Gerard Meijssen)
- Re: Comparisons between DBpedia and Wikidata (Dimitris Kontokostas)
- Weekly Summary #256 (Léa Lacroix)
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:14:21 +0200 From: Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikidata] Comparisons between DBpedia and Wikidata Message-ID: <CAO53wxWYCoq69ctbQK75xYnAfMJB0vZV3u718vgBmLrP1HmNjw@mail. gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hoi, With the recent introduction of federation for DBpedia, it is possible to have queries for the DBpedias for a specific language and Wikidata. I have blogged how we can make use for this [1].
It makes it much easier to compare Wikidata and DBpedia and when we take this serious and apply some effort we can make a tool like the one by Pasleim [2] for Wikipedias that do not have a category for people who died in a given year. Thanks, GerardM
[1] http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017/04/wikidata- user-story-dbpedia-death-and.html [2] http://tools.wmflabs.org/pltools/recentdeaths/
On 1 April 2017 at 11:34, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, I was asked by one of the DBpedia people to write a project plan.. I gave it a try [1].
The idea is to first compare DBpedia with Wikidata where a comparison is possible. When it is not (differences in their classes for instance) it
is
at first not what we focus on.
Please comment on the talk page and when there are things missing in the plan, please help it improve. Thanks, GerardM
[1] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:GerardM/DBpedia_for_Quality
On 1 April 2017 at 10:44, Reem Al-Kashif reemalkashif@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I don't have an idea about how to develop this, but it seems like an interesting project!
Best, Reem
On 30 Mar 2017 10:17, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Much of the content of DBpedia and Wikidata have the same origin; harvesting data from a Wikipedia. There is a lot of discussion going
on
about quality and one point that I make is that comparing "Sources" and concentrating on the differences particularly where statements differ
is
where it is easiest to make a quality difference.
So given that DBpedia harvests both Wikipedia and Wikidata, can it provide us with a view where a Wikipedia statement and a Wikidata
statement
differ. To make it useful, it is important to subset this data. I will
not
start with 500.000 differences but I will begin when they are about a subset that I care about.
When I care about entries for alumni of a university, I will consider curating the information in question. Particularly when I know the
language
of the Wikipedia.
When we can do this, another thing that will promote the use of a tool like this is when regularly (say once a month) numbers are stored and trends are published.
How difficult is it to come up with something like this. I know this tool would be based on DBpedia but there are several reasons why this
is
good. First it gives added relevance to DBpedia (without detracting
from
Wikidata) and secondly as DBpedia updates on RSS changes for several Wikipedias, the effect of these changes is quickly noticed when a new
set
of data is requested.
Please let us know what the issues are and what it takes to move
forward
with this, Does this make sense? Thanks, GerardM
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017/03/quality-dbpedia-a nd-kappa-alpha-psi.html
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata