Sir
As a Professor of English and having specialization in Stylistics, I teach
literature, linguistics, phonetics, stylistics and creative writing
to PG students. I have published two poetry books in English and a
Monograph on Literary stylistics. Scholars have obtained Ph.D. on
my creative and innovative poetry. My poems have appeared in international
journals in India and abroad.
I want to submit my biography to be included in Wikipedia, and I want to
submit my Vital Article on Linguistic Landscaping in Poetry
and other feature articles.
Will you please guide me how to carry out my task, that is, the process and
link for my task .
May I expect your early reply.
With deep regards.
Prof. (Dr.) Nar Deo Sharma
H.No. 2/415, Kala Kuan,
ALWAR-301001(Rajasthan)
INDIA
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:30 PM, <wikidata-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Send Wikidata mailing list submissions to
wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wikidata-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
wikidata-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wikidata digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Comparisons between DBpedia and Wikidata (Gerard Meijssen)
2. Re: Comparisons between DBpedia and Wikidata
(Dimitris Kontokostas)
3. Weekly Summary #256 (Léa Lacroix)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:14:21 +0200
From: Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project."
<wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikidata] Comparisons between DBpedia and Wikidata
Message-ID:
<CAO53wxWYCoq69ctbQK75xYnAfMJB0vZV3u718vgBmLrP1HmNjw@mail.
gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hoi,
With the recent introduction of federation for DBpedia, it is possible to
have queries for the DBpedias for a specific language and Wikidata. I have
blogged how we can make use for this [1].
It makes it much easier to compare Wikidata and DBpedia and when we take
this serious and apply some effort we can make a tool like the one by
Pasleim [2] for Wikipedias that do not have a category for people who died
in a given year.
Thanks,
GerardM
[1]
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017/04/wikidata-
user-story-dbpedia-death-and.html
[2]
http://tools.wmflabs.org/pltools/recentdeaths/
On 1 April 2017 at 11:34, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hoi,
I was asked by one of the DBpedia people to write a project plan.. I gave
it a try [1].
The idea is to first compare DBpedia with Wikidata where a comparison is
possible. When it is not (differences in their classes for instance) it
is
at first not what we focus on.
Please comment on the talk page and when there are things missing in the
plan, please help it improve.
Thanks,
GerardM
[1]
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:GerardM/DBpedia_for_Quality
On 1 April 2017 at 10:44, Reem Al-Kashif <reemalkashif(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't have an idea about how to develop this, but it seems like an
> interesting project!
>
> Best,
> Reem
>
> On 30 Mar 2017 10:17, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> Much of the content of DBpedia and Wikidata have the same origin;
>> harvesting data from a Wikipedia. There is a lot of discussion going
on
>> about quality and one point that I make
is that comparing "Sources" and
>> concentrating on the differences particularly where statements differ
is
>> where it is easiest to make a quality
difference.
>>
>> So given that DBpedia harvests both Wikipedia and Wikidata, can it
>> provide us with a view where a Wikipedia statement and a Wikidata
statement
>> differ. To make it useful, it is
important to subset this data. I will
not
>> start with 500.000 differences but I will
begin when they are about a
>> subset that I care about.
>>
>> When I care about entries for alumni of a university, I will consider
>> curating the information in question. Particularly when I know the
language
>> of the Wikipedia.
>>
>> When we can do this, another thing that will promote the use of a tool
>> like this is when regularly (say once a month) numbers are stored and
>> trends are published.
>>
>> How difficult is it to come up with something like this. I know this
>> tool would be based on DBpedia but there are several reasons why this
is
>> good. First it gives added relevance to
DBpedia (without detracting
from
>> Wikidata) and secondly as DBpedia updates
on RSS changes for several
>> Wikipedias, the effect of these changes is quickly noticed when a new
set
>> of data is requested.
>>
>> Please let us know what the issues are and what it takes to move
forward
with this, Does this make sense?
Thanks,
GerardM
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017/03/quality-dbpedia-a
nd-kappa-alpha-psi.html
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata