Thanks, it made me realize the datas of my city are not up to date :) I thought : I wondered if I would see https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16037012 (although the city is not that big, but Rennes, a comparable on, showed up in the results, so ...) and it did not.
There is redundancy in this area: the ''head of goverment'' of cities is also present as a ''office heald'' : ''mayor of foo'', if there is an item ''mayor of foo'' (and this seems better than just ''office heald:mayor'').
Tom
2015-04-21 11:27 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kinzler daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de:
Am 21.04.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
On 20.04.2015 23:47, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Something seems to be wrong with the order, though. Munich (pop > 1m in
all
statements) is listed way after Chemnitz (pop < 300k in all
statements). Any
idea why?
Good catch. My query was too simple (using one "random" population
instead of
the biggest one). Here is a better query, this time even with
populations given:
I still wonder how the old result came about, since the *all* population values for Munich are much bigger than *all* the population numbers for Chemnitz. Even with picking a random value, how could the order have been reversed?
-- Daniel Kinzler Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l